Please Change So I Feel Better
Tuesday, July 12, 2011 at 7:26AM 
Every so often, the Rowdies get... well... Rowdy.
Most of the time they just listen to me (like good little Rowdies should - ha!).
But every so often, there's a topic that comes up for the forum that just isn't easy. It requires re-writing brain-religions.
And re-writing a brain-religion isn't that easy.
Yesterday was a big day on the Rowdy forum. We had a Rowdy (Rowdy Connection Wanter) that had gotten into a fight with her husband. She was so heart broken over her story. She believed that HE should be her Emotional Partner.
This is a classic Rowdy story of "Please change so that I can feel better." (Of course - Rowdies know that we never need someone else to change so that we feel better. But we forget sometimes and need to be reminded.)
So... if you've ever wanted someone to be different so that you could feel better... (I mean who hasn't, right?) read on.
Rowdy Connection Wanter:
I had a fight with my husband last night. It was more of an explosion. The fight was over something stupid. Over who does more. A cliché, really. But I wanted him to make sure he knew what a martyr I am.
About 30 minutes after I erupted, I apologized, even though it sucked to do it because I HATE apologizing.
But here’s the problem. I woke up this morning and I still feel angry, and abandoned, and alone. But I feel so raw, and so empty, and like there is just a giant hole in me. I am in so much pain today. I can’t stop crying. I feel like everything is broken. And that I am too tired to fix it.
What I feel so raw about is that I feel like he is not being an emotional partner in our marriage. And I know he does care. But I want more. I want to see it more. I want to feel it more. I want to stop trying to convince myself that he is emotionally enough. I know this is all work I need to do for myself.
Meadow:
I know you’re sad. But you're only sad because of the thoughts that you are believing. (BTW... that's a BIG only.)
You're not sad because your husband doesn't feel like an emotional partner.
You're sad because of your story about your husband.
It's painful to want someone else to be different.
It’s truly the recipe for hell.
Rowdy Connection Wanter:
But what if my story about my husband is true? What if he really is emotionally unavailable? What if he really doesn't want more? What if he really isn't an emotional parnter?
Meadow:
You said you don't FEEL like he's an emotional partner.
Your feelings are your own creation.
Let's just say (for fun) that he isn't emotionally available. This is fact. It will never change.
Then what?
I'm racking my brain to think of what you mean by "emotional partner." And I'm thinking there's no such thing.
What's your definition?
Rowdy Connection Wanter:
Hmmm...emotional partner to me would be someone who I can be emotionally intimate with.
Rowdy Mama:
I would agree that your husband doesn't feel like an emotional partner is a thought, but perhaps there is an actual circumstance that he is not an emotional partner right now. Perhaps this is actually a fact. I know that this isn't her situation, but let's say someone's husband is cheating on them, never home, out boozing etc. etc. It might actually be factual that he is not an emotional partner and that it's not a story. Am I totally off base here?
Meadow:
I think I'm getting hung up on this "emotional partner" title.
I think this title isn't going to be useful in this situation.
And yes - there are Circumstances like
C: Husband slept with someone else.
C: Husband takes drugs.
C: Husband is drunk.
C: Husband is not home.
C: Husband does not speak words.
But what we make that mean is up to us.
Rowdy Connection Wanter:
This is really interesting Meadow. I have used this word for most of my married life. but I think you're right...it's a stupid idea. I mean, everyone has emotions, therefore anyone can be an EMOTIONAL partner. Partner implies a connection or relationship. I don't want my husband to have the SAME emotions as me. So, why use that word. How about just saying that I want my husband to be a partner.
I think also it's a dangerous concept for me. Because when I use the word emotional partner, what I really mean is that I want my husband to have read the manual, and do all the things I think he should say or do, and then he would be an emotional robot partner. Youch. You're right. I don't want any of those things. I gave up the manual months ago, and I never want it back.
Rowdy 6 Year Old:
Love the work on the 'emotional partner' thing. Not sure I understand the trip-up in the term "emotional partner" which I think just means 'connection'.
If wanting connection is part of the emotional recipe for hell then I am really lost. If a woman does it all right (let's just assume that for purposes of my feeble mind right now) but her man doesn't join up with her efforts to connect, then what?
I feel like a 6-year-old.
Meadow....
Meadow:
Ok - so this is where the problem is that you guys are confused about what connection is. Connection isn't an Action. And it isn't a Result. And it isn't a Circumstance.
Connection is a Feeling. That YOU feel.
I can feel very connected to someone - and yet - they can feel very disconnected to me. And vice versa.
Whether I feel connected to them - depends on what I think. Not on what they think, feel or do.
There's no such thing as having a partner in feeling. You feel what you feel because of what you're thinking.
Holding another person responsible for your feelings (including 'connection') is the recipe for hell. Understanding that your thoughts (and your thoughts only) create the feeling is the recipe for peace.
A man does not have to 'connect' for a woman to feel connected.
Rowdy 6 Year Old:
Meadow,
How does a woman know that she has done everything she can for the marriage? She loves him, but she cannot talk her way into 'feeling' connected to a man that has distanced himself emotionally, physically, financially (fill in more blanks here) and he does nothing.
Thanks for your patience in explaining. Not trying to be ornery... just want to be clear.
Meadow:
A woman will never know that she has done everything she can for the marriage. That's impossible to ever know.
You have only done what you've done. No more. No less.
She can only know what she must do for herself.
If she loves him - then she loves that he doesn't want to connect back. At the same time, she loves herself - and is CONNECTED to herself enough to live the life she wants without holding him responsible for creating the life she wants to live.
She can definitely feel connected to a man that has distanced himself.
I know this.
Because I've done this.
I felt very connected to my hub when I left him. And he was disconnected from me physically, emotionally and financially. But that had nothing to do with how connected I felt to him.
But more importantly, I felt connected to myself. I knew I didn't need him to change. I knew I needed me to change to feel better.
Rowdy Connection Wanter
I could be totally wrong here, but I think most people, at least I know for myself, desire a deeper connection with their spouse than with anyone else. And maybe that in itself is a problem.
I also think that if you have given everything you have to make that connection, and your partner doesn't reciprocate, then it would be time to clean up your thoughts about leaving, and leave. Am i wrong here??
Meadow:
I think that the problem here is that people want to have a deeper connection with ANOTHER PERSON.
Seriously.
We want connection and then we point at someone and say: YOU first. YOU Connect to ME.
All the while - we don't realize that this behavior is DISCONNECTING us from ourselves.
The important work is for ME to connect to ME. And then when I'm connected to ME - I also feel connected to YOU.
And darling - you can't give everything you have to make a connection. Connection is a feeling. It's not a result. You either think thoughts that create the feeling of connection or you don't. It has nothing to do with being reciprocated.
Rowdies,
self help tips in
Inspiration 







